3 ms·
Let's be super-clear. If you sympathize with or outright support this, you are either clinically diagnosable as a psychopath or are under the sway of one or ma
by mrangle 2y ago
Let's be super-clear.
If you sympathize with or outright support this, you are either clinically diagnosable as a psychopath or are under the sway of one or many.
If you are a psychopath yourself, your worldview is rejected in-full by anyone with normal psychology. Stuff your psychopathic attempts at persuasion.
If you are generally a normal person but found yourself swayed by the techniques of psychopathic people, many of whom exist in society's institutions and who do not have your best interests at heart, you should take some time, deeply rethink this, and then reject it.
If you do not reject this, ultimately, you belong on a number of watch lists, full stop, as you are a supporter of domestic terrorism that seeks to murder people in cold blood.
But reject it.
This pseudo-hysteria is a criminal trap, and beyond that its logic is complete nonsense.
If this man was guilty of anything, then the law would have held him accountable. He was not guilty in terms of how he delivered service, and anything further that he may have been guilty of his murderer deprived society of finding out. Officially, he's innocent.
Every time that a citizen is "removed" by psychopaths by reason of their perceived arbitrary complaints, immediately there is another person who meets the same or arbitrarily adjusted criteria. The criteria will be adjusted to target people. There will never be even-ground for the psychopaths, and their follower-victims, who are justifying this.
In this discussion, I was asked if the murdered CEO didn't share responsibility for the supposed fact that UH is "the hardest to deal with and rejects the most claims". For one second, let's ignore that denying claims is a part of the root health insurance business model that every single payer advocate wants: only to be run by the government. For one moment, let's ignore that the CEO did not invent the health insurance industry, nor is he responsible for its continuity. Let's assume that UH soon "reforms" and is no longer "the worst". Immediately, there will be a new "worst". Is the CEO of than new low ranker the next target? Now model this situation across other industries.
Brainless, soulless psychopaths do not serve logic, morality, nor society's interests. They serve their own bloodlust. Which can manifest in any number of ways, but sometimes it manifests in actual murder.
Stop being persuaded by their nonsense.
This is a crazy thread to have on HN. It's widely supportive of domestic terrorism and murder, seeks to perpetuate support for it, and the Mods should take it down. It's shameful, horrific shit and HN should be fully embarrassed to host it.
- spprashant 2y agoOk, but this article isn't saying anything you are arguing against. Unless you meant to reply against a comment.