4 ms·
hetzner is cheap, but cheap often has hidden costs / risks. aws, azure, and gcp aren’t cheap , but they offer better stability—both technically and operational
by wenbin 2y ago
hetzner is cheap, but cheap often has hidden costs / risks.
aws, azure, and gcp aren’t cheap , but they offer better stability—both technically and operationally.
- nithril 2y agoaws, azure and gcp aren't cheap for sure, but for sure they are doing a lot of money
- n144q 2y agoAnd service. AWS has lots of problems. But they have a team of real humans that respond to tickets around the clock and actually understand stuff. To many businesses, that's worth the extra cost clone.
- pknomad 2y agoYep. Obviously YMMV, but I found AWS TAM to be much better than Google Cloud's (but that's not surprising).
- bigfatkitten 2y agoI wouldn't go as far as to say GCP has service or support, though AWS definitely does. Even if you're a nobody spending $30 a month, AWS are extremely responsive and helpful.