3 ms·
That's great! Not believing studies, I mean. They're not religious artefacts handed down by gods above What you _can_ do, is read the study, especially the int
by GeoAtreides 2y ago
That's great! Not believing studies, I mean. They're not religious artefacts handed down by gods above
What you _can_ do, is read the study, especially the introduction, where it states what the study is about, the methods, which describe how the actual study went in real life, and the conclusion, which summarizes what we've learned from this.
After doing this, you can then maybe try a synthesis between the study thesis and your antithesis? Y'know, something a bit more substantial than a random drive-by comment
- dyauspitr 2y agoI did read the abstract. It did mention that they relied on internally created T but then the title is a bit misleading.