3 ms·
Honestly, doesn't seem like it would be that bad. Presumably you could then have a static go vet check for any time you implicitly initialize a union type to th
by jchw 2y ago
Honestly, doesn't seem like it would be that bad. Presumably you could then have a static go vet check for any time you implicitly initialize a union type to the zero value, then it's roughly the same compromise as handling copies of non-copyable values.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]