I do agree that these models are lacking significant capabilities to be considered even in the ballpark of humans, and it's unclear if their architecture, scale

I do agree that these models are lacking significant capabilities to be considered even in the ballpark of humans, and it's unclear if their architecture, scaled up, ever will be, but this strikes me as a very imprecise distinction: > They are merely generating what seems to "come next" logically. So are you and I: We're predicting what we'll do next.