The author is clearly better informed than the average journalist. However, I think it's strange how the article discusses o1 as though it's some new mystery cl

The author is clearly better informed than the average journalist. However, I think it's strange how the article discusses o1 as though it's some new mystery class of model that no one understands. I mean yes, the exact training recipe isn't known, but it's pretty clear that it is still a GPT model that outputs some chain-of-thought material inside <thinking>...</thinking> tags, which is filtered from the user's view.