4 ms·
Okay so you’re going with even given the circumstances. That means you need to provide cites for how, at the time and given the information they had, their deci
by gcanyon 2y ago
Okay so you’re going with even given the circumstances. That means you need to provide cites for how, at the time and given the information they had, their decision making was flawed.
Further, it means you can't just jump back to free-speech absolutism. Please explain how, at the time and given the circumstances, their actions were flawed to the point of deserving the criticism you're dishing out.
- trimethylpurine 2y agoI'm not saying they were right or wrong. I'm saying, avoidable or not, trust in science and the government should be a factor in deciding what's best. Seems to me like, if it was, we'd have fewer articles like this one. Start by discrediting theories with results that adhere to scientific rigor.
- gcanyon 2y agoYou said "relied on a standard of research that is lesser than what would be considered a C+ lab report in any university chemistry lab in America" Now you're refusing to back that up.
- trimethylpurine 2y agoI did. The reviewers of the Pfizer vaccine were the researchers. Every one an employee of Pfizer. That's an F grade in any chem lab course. At least any paper I would grade.