I understand the second paragraph, but: > Having a right and receiving justice are two different things. That doesn't yet make sense to me. What good is a rig

I understand the second paragraph, but: > Having a right and receiving justice are two different things. That doesn't yet make sense to me. What good is a right if it stays theoretical, without an ability to execute that right in practice? Or, in other words, if a person has a right but there are no ways to execute that right, how is this situation practically different from that person not having a right at all?