2 ms·
Huh? Here's what you said prior to your edit (though your edit isn't actually responsive to my counterargument anyway): > um, that's kind of....the diametric o
by llamaimperative 2y ago
Huh? Here's what you said prior to your edit (though your edit isn't actually responsive to my counterargument anyway):
> um, that's kind of....the diametric opposite of what an overwhelming majority of Americans just voted for.
Please substantiate your claim. There was no overwhelming majority, and even if there were, it does not at all mean that people voted for this particular policy. Again: you're free to provide evidence otherwise.
- zzzeek 2y agoit's not at all the primary point i was making and the army of HN pedants to argue about a particular poorly chosen adjective to pretend somehow that the more important point I made is moot is as usual very tiresome, I edited the post to remove the offending adjective.
- llamaimperative 2y agoYour primary point is there is strong public sentiment toward healthcare privatization. There is no evidence of this claim. If you have any, please provide it. You attempted to provide the election which is not valid evidence for several reasons. There is no evidence of a mandate from the public in the direction you’re suggesting there is.