3 ms·
Having a right and receiving justice are two different things. The point is that you can’t say that something is a human right and at the same time define cond
by layer8 2y ago
Having a right and receiving justice are two different things.
The point is that you can’t say that something is a human right and at the same time define conditions upon which they don’t apply to some human(s), which the GP comment tried to do.
- phoe-krk 2y agoI understand the second paragraph, but: > Having a right and receiving justice are two different things. That doesn't yet make sense to me. What good is a right if it stays theoretical, without an ability to execute that right in practice? Or, in other words, if a person has a right but there are no ways to execute that right, how is this situation practically different from that person not having a right at all?