3 ms·
He was killing people though, and if his death stops that, it's a net positive. His life is not worth more than the thousands he has ended for personal profit.
by laimewhisps 2y ago
He was killing people though, and if his death stops that, it's a net positive. His life is not worth more than the thousands he has ended for personal profit.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> if his death stops that, it's a net positive One, it doesn’t. Two, this applies in loads of cases depending on your individual morality. (Intentionally-spicy takes: abortion providers. Medical researchers who experiment on animals. Farmers. Meat eaters. Anyone American because of our foreign military interventions.)
- laimewhisps 2y agoWhen the state's monopoly on violence doesn't protect people, people will find a way to protect themselves.
- gruez 2y agoThis goes both ways. See: south africa where every rich dude has a private security detail.
- laimewhisps 2y agoThis sounds like the same way because if rich people need protection, they must be under threat of people who feel exploited by them. Just like the OP.
- Tryk 2y agoHow can you be so sure it hasn't saved someone? You can make the case that doctors make less mistakes when they don't rush through surgery. https://apnews.com/article/anthem-blue-cross-anesthesia-insurance-coverage-c8233db68f76342c4e794320f151a926 https://apnews.com/article/anthem-blue-cross-anesthesia-insu...
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> can make the case that doctors make less mistakes when they don't rush through surgery Healthcare PR is in overdrive right now because people want this story. In truth, the anaesthesia debate started a few days before the shooting.