3 ms·
pfff. I found this difficult to read. My father in law has a Nobel (shared with his team). He worked on the environmental science that went to form Kyoto. He'
by nonrandomstring 2y ago
pfff.
I found this difficult to read.
My father in law has a Nobel (shared with his team). He worked on the
environmental science that went to form Kyoto. He's from a working
class background and has two characteristics that Guardian writers
naturally have a blind-spot for; being smart and working very, very
hard.
Being a climate scientist he also has a sense of humour (as you must).
He hangs the prize in the toilet, because - as he says - for all the
fucking good it does.
- like_any_other 2y ago> two characteristics that Guardian writers naturally have a blind-spot for; being smart and working very, very hard. Only in the sense that Trofim Lysenko had a "blind spot" for Darwinism. Despite the Big Five personality traits being 40-60% heritable [1], and adult IQ 80% heritable [2], The Guardian simply rejects this evidence - from the article: So either talent is hugely unequally distributed, concentrated among richer families, or opportunity is. It’s the latter. That's leaving aside how upbringing is completely omitted as a factor - we are supposed to simply consider it "unfair" that e.g. the best blacksmiths were the sons of blacksmiths. [1] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5068715/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5068715/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heritability_of_IQ
- tptacek 2y agoWhat is it you're saying "heritability" means here?