Ok, so let's check that quora link. The answer is by some random web designer. Their source is this: https://web.archive.org/web/20120116201141/http://code.goo

Ok, so let's check that quora link. The answer is by some random web designer. Their source is this: https://web.archive.org/web/20120116201141/http://code.google.com/team/index.html?product=chrome https://web.archive.org/web/20120116201141/http://code.googl... And what does that page say? Right at the top: > Here are some members of the Developer Relations team It's not the Chrome engineering team. It's some part of just the team doing developer outreach (not necessarily even the entirity of that team). You keep finding these obviously incorrect references to support your arguments, and presenting them as facts. And by obvious I mean really obvious. There is no way you can read that page and mistakenly think it's the Chrome engineering team. At this point the best case is that you're not actually reading any of these sources, and just randomly pasting them here. The worst case is that you've noticed that your sources are bogus, and just don't care. Neither of those is arguing in good faith.