4 ms·
I got you with your call for a well designed API and I am with you. About a benchmark, I have none, but it is the nature of threading. Threads need to store an
by js4all 14y ago
I got you with your call for a well designed API and I am with you.
About a benchmark, I have none, but it is the nature of threading. Threads need to store and switch contexts. Even if it is just a few 100KBs with 100000 connections this easily multiplies to a gig of additional memory use. In the real world this is often a few MBs per thread making that scale even impossible for a mid class server.
- papsosouid 14y agoNo that's not how green threads work, which was the whole point. You can have an API that presents you with "threads", but not have any actual threads underlying it. It is just a state machine running async, event driven code under the hood. The overhead of such a system is no higher than it is using the naive and error prone event loop approach. Here's a paper on using userland threads to get the API advantages of threading, with the scaling advantages of event driven programming: http://static.usenix.org/events/hotos03/tech/vonbehren.html http://static.usenix.org/events/hotos03/tech/vonbehren.html