4 ms·
What were the choices they had when picking a roof material? While lead has it's disadvantages, it was probably the best choice of them. Lead - the traditional
by chiph 2y ago
What were the choices they had when picking a roof material? While lead has it's disadvantages, it was probably the best choice of them.
Lead - the traditional material using for cathedral roofing is easy to work with, easily soldered to prevent leaks, but is heavy and is toxic when burned.
Copper - Also a traditional material that is easy to work with, also easily soldered to prevent leaks, is lightweight and non-toxic. But the roof would be green afterwards (once it oxidizes) not dull gray.
Steel - Lightweight, can be cut & bent to fit around crenelations. But can't be soldered - any waterproofing would have to be done with caulking & crimping other steel over joints. Available colors to match the original lead. Won't last as long as some other choices (it eventually rusts).
Composite asphalt shingles - just no.
Wooden shingles - Moderately difficult to work with. Easily burns. Will get moldy unless treated with chemicals.
Slate tile - Very difficult to work with, but inflammable. Heavier than lead and is brittle. But it would have a similar color to the lead its replacing.
Concrete tile - similar pros + cons as slate, but cheaper and doesn't last quite as long.
- henearkr 2y agoCopper is the best choice from your list. Color is ok. Anyway the original color of the outside of the cathedral was nothing comparable with the monochrome stone white of today (that's right, churches and cathedrals were artistically painted, in the Middle Ages). And there are plenty of copper roofs everywhere in France, including on cathedrals. Also you forgot to mention zinc.