3 ms·

" not really sure who's worse" What is the hot take on the rebels.? Are these the ones the US was backing a few years ago against ISIS? Is this another case

" not really sure who's worse" What is the hot take on the rebels.? Are these the ones the US was backing a few years ago against ISIS? Is this another case of the replacement is worse? Or not? Assad was so bad for using chemical weapons on citizens, the US couldn't conceive of worse? But is that true?

Ygg2 2y ago
> What is the hot take on the rebels.? > "with this spirit… we will not only reach Damascus, but, Allah permitting, Jerusalem will be awaiting our arrival” https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/hayat-tahrir-al-sham-rebel-fighters-syria-abu-mohammed-al-jawlani-13840682.html https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/hayat-tahrir-al-sham-re... > Assad was so bad for using chemical weapons on citizens, the US couldn't conceive of worse? But is that true? I never doubt in ability of US to snatch defeat from jaws of victory. I'm starting to think they do it on purpose. I mean chaos is good for Raytheon stocks.
Eumenes 2y ago
> Assad was so bad for using chemical weapons on citizens Thats fake/contested https://x.com/scotthortonshow/status/1863289718890193160 https://x.com/scotthortonshow/status/1863289718890193160
- KptMarchewa 2y ago
  Stop reading russian propaganda. There's zero truth in that word salad.
  - Eumenes 2y ago
    What trusted sources do you have on middle eastern conflicts? The Council on Foreign Relations, The Atlantic Council? Foreign Affairs magazine? These institutions are stocked with neocon stooges whose advice have only invaded half the middle east (always under false pretenses), killed countless innocence, displaced millions, brought "democracy", etc. Scott Horton and antiwar.com have been pumping out real journalism for 20+ years.
    - ImPostingOnHN 2y ago
      My friend, you posted a tweet-rant from a random conspiracy theorist. I think the better question, then, is: What reliable sources do you have? Because this is not one.
      - Eumenes 2y ago
        How about Seymour Hersh? https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v35/n24/seymour-m.-hersh/whose-sarin https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v35/n24/seymour-m.-hersh/who...

Ygg2 2y ago

> What is the hot take on the rebels.? > "with this spirit… we will not only reach Damascus, but, Allah permitting, Jerusalem will be awaiting our arrival” https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/hayat-tahrir-al-sham-rebel-fighters-syria-abu-mohammed-al-jawlani-13840682.html https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/hayat-tahrir-al-sham-re... > Assad was so bad for using chemical weapons on citizens, the US couldn't conceive of worse? But is that true? I never doubt in ability of US to snatch defeat from jaws of victory. I'm starting to think they do it on purpose. I mean chaos is good for Raytheon stocks.

Eumenes 2y ago

> Assad was so bad for using chemical weapons on citizens Thats fake/contested https://x.com/scotthortonshow/status/1863289718890193160 https://x.com/scotthortonshow/status/1863289718890193160

KptMarchewa 2y ago
Stop reading russian propaganda. There's zero truth in that word salad.
- Eumenes 2y ago
  What trusted sources do you have on middle eastern conflicts? The Council on Foreign Relations, The Atlantic Council? Foreign Affairs magazine? These institutions are stocked with neocon stooges whose advice have only invaded half the middle east (always under false pretenses), killed countless innocence, displaced millions, brought "democracy", etc. Scott Horton and antiwar.com have been pumping out real journalism for 20+ years.
  - ImPostingOnHN 2y ago
    My friend, you posted a tweet-rant from a random conspiracy theorist. I think the better question, then, is: What reliable sources do you have? Because this is not one.
    - Eumenes 2y ago
      How about Seymour Hersh? https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v35/n24/seymour-m.-hersh/whose-sarin https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v35/n24/seymour-m.-hersh/who...