4 ms·
Not trying to be pedantic, but you literally asked for false claims to be called out and shut down. There is no open source license (that I know of) which requ
by CorrectHorseBat 2y ago
Not trying to be pedantic, but you literally asked for false claims to be called out and shut down.
There is no open source license (that I know of) which requires public availability. If there is a requirement of providing sources, it's always a requirement of providing sources with a derived work. If you are not releasing derived works to anyone you don't need to release any source to anyone either. So called permissive licenses don't even have any requirement on providing sources whatsoever.
- foolswisdom 2y agoThat's because license requirements are on _other_ users (who are being licensed to use it) to follow, not the owner (who _owns_ it and doesn't need to follow the license terms the owner requires of others). Nevertheless, not every license is open source, open source does have a definition, and it's not about whether the owner is following their own license.