3 ms·
Same goes for Russia, and is all seems pretty relevant. The article seem to indicate that it's much more sustainable for the West than for Russia.
by TheAlchemist 2y ago
Same goes for Russia, and is all seems pretty relevant.
The article seem to indicate that it's much more sustainable for the West than for Russia.
- wiseowise 2y agoIt’s not sustainable for Ukraine.
- fooker 2y agoNATO is ensuring it’s just about sustainable.
- lukan 2y agoYes, by pushing to reduce the drafting age, which the Ukrainian don't want to, because someone needs to raise families and Ukraine has a way lower population, while Putin brings in north koreans already. And can also escalate by general mobilisation at some point if cornered. So I don't see the outcome as clear.
- aguaviva 2y agoIt's not sustainable for -either- side. Both sides are aching (very badly) for this thing to be over, or at least taken off the stove. One can quibble further as to the details -- which are a matter of metrics, wildcards, politics. And (as recent events have shown) there are still many cards to be played. But that's the fundamental equation we need to keep in mind.
- sabbaticaldev 2y agothe article is not the reality tho