4 ms·
which means close the site and ignore the article. Or wait for some kind soul to post the archived version on HN lol.
by 14 2y ago
which means close the site and ignore the article. Or wait for some kind soul to post the archived version on HN lol.
- fragmede 2y agoI might get kicked out of the cool kids club for suggesting this, but, err, maybe we could use money in exchange for goods and se services? I know! it's a crazy idea. it'll never work. but still.
- akira2501 2y agoThe "service" of writing down things people have said out loud is pretty low margin. So your choices are to put a paywall up and hope people pay a flat rate for whatever you happen to offer each month or to increase your distribution as much as you can while embedding relevant static advertisements. Since delivery is exceedingly cheap it seems obvious which strategy to use.
- oarsinsync 2y ago> The "service" of writing down things people have said out loud is Unclear why "service" is in quotes. Not many people get to be in the room where it happens. The people that do get to be in the room, absolutely do provide a real service to the rest of us who don't.
- akira2501 2y ago> Unclear why "service" is in quotes. Not many people get to be in the room where it happens. You answer your own question. There's no reason at this point in history the "room size" needs to be artificially limited. Was the Arm CEO paid for their time? If not, why not? > absolutely do provide a real service to the rest of us who don't. It's service for Arm not you. If you wanted unbiased analysis of Intel's position you might seek someone other than a direct competitor. Which makes paywalling this all the more baffling.
- nottorp 2y agoYep. It will never work when everyone wants you to commit to a year of hard to cancel subscription to read one article that is possibly lousy. Especially since - see another comment thread here on HN - their "AI" thinks you're a regular reader when you click on them once per month.