3 ms·
> The original comment was about running DOS programs under OS/2 1.0. No, it didn't: it specified OS/2 2.0, but I missed that just as you did. « OS/2 2.X was
by lproven 2y ago
> The original comment was about running DOS programs under OS/2 1.0.
No, it didn't: it specified OS/2 2.0, but I missed that just as you did.
«
OS/2 2.X was superior to Windows 3.0
»
«
I had to downgrade OS/2 2.X systems
»