3 ms·
Yes, for many reasons. What else were you expecting? It tends to be more a cost-effective way of using the research money, it's considered more ethical, it has
by yencabulator 2y ago
Yes, for many reasons. What else were you expecting? It tends to be more a cost-effective way of using the research money, it's considered more ethical, it has less legal risk, and so on.
If you're saying you want to perform a full-head transplant on humans without ever succeeding on apes, people would very rightly call you delusional.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoHow about think instead. The amount of precaution required is a function of the risk and reward. That's a stupid analogy. The downside would be death.