3 ms·
> didn't even scratch the concrete. Exactly my point. Thanks for confirming. In general, attacking nuclear infrastructure with missiles is not considered fun
by mpweiher 2y ago
> didn't even scratch the concrete.
Exactly my point. Thanks for confirming. In general, attacking nuclear infrastructure with missiles is not considered funny.
But hey: give it a try! See how "funny" whatever anti-terror forces you nave in your country find it.
> The facts are well-known. [goes on to list an opinion of someone expressing "grave concern"]
My kind of humor!
Once again: nuclear is the pretty much the only power generation left in Ukraine, apart from Diesel generators. That is actual evidence.
Oh, and Ukraine is building new nuclear power plants.
- natmaka 2y ago> attacking nuclear infrastructure with missiles Do you really consider a little rocket (RPG) as equivalent to a missile, or it a joke? > See how "funny" whatever anti-terror forces Not sure anyone considers them sufficient since quite a while (9/11, anyone?) > list an opinion of someone expressing "grave concern" He is the boss of the UN Agency in charge of nuclear civilian applications and the communiqué clearly describes the causes of his concerns. > nuclear is the pretty much the only power generation left in Ukraine Because they don't have any other industrial electricity-equipment, and therefore no other option (bar a nearly-permanent nearly-complete-blackout), as they didn't start their energy transition yet (for various reasons). > Ukraine is building new nuclear power plants Those now are bare approved projects. My point is about the risk, not about choosing nuclear (balancing the pros and cons, risk included, and doing so objectively) nor building then exploiting it as planned.