> Bringing in an "expert" to explain to how it's probably something else, without any evidence to support that hypothesis [...] Where in the article do you get

> Bringing in an "expert" to explain to how it's probably something else, without any evidence to support that hypothesis [...] Where in the article do you get that impression? All I see is the expert saying it is unlikely to have been a contract killing, as the MO doesn't fit with that of a professional hitman.