When combined with intellectual honesty and curiosity, the best LLMs can be powerful tools for checking argumentation. (I personally recommend Claude 3.5 Sonnet

When combined with intellectual honesty and curiosity, the best LLMs can be powerful tools for checking argumentation. (I personally recommend Claude 3.5 Sonnet.) I pasted in the conversation history and here is what it said: > Their position is falsifiable through simple examples: LLMs can perform arithmetic on numbers that weren't in training data, compose responses about current events post-training, and generate novel combinations of ideas. Spot on. It would take a lot of editing for me to speak as concisely and accurately!