3 ms·
> they have a goofy law where there is a list of approved guns (that get there by paying a fee) that, for some reason, police are exempt from Government always
by mindslight 2y ago
> they have a goofy law where there is a list of approved guns (that get there by paying a fee) that, for some reason, police are exempt from
Government always excepts itself from gun control regulation. It's why the NRA failing to support Breonna Taylor was so glaringly transparent - the entire point of the supposed lobbying organization is to defend private gun ownership against the conflicting desires of government. But instead they lined right up behind the government oppressors! Like what exactly do they think destruction of the second amendment looks like if it's not government agents invading your home at night and summarily executing you for exercising your purported right of self defense?
- 15155 2y agoWhy exactly would the Breonna Taylor incident require the support of the NRA/ILA? How did that issue pertain to firearms law?
- mindslight 2y agoKenneth Walker was in the exact position of someone defending against a night time home invasion. If you believe that defending yourself in such a way is a constitutional natural right, there is no choice but to conclude that his firearm use was justified. Then, this idea that police are justified in responding to a straightforward and lawful home defense by retaliating with a hail of bullets is plainly an anathema to the second amendment. As I said, what else do you think exercising the right to self defense in your home at night would involve?