5 ms·
You seem to restate the argument of the submitted research paper in a narrow interpretation that is much different than its main conclusion of Model Collapse fr
by patrickhogan1 2y ago
You seem to restate the argument of the submitted research paper in a narrow interpretation that is much different than its main conclusion of Model Collapse from synthetic data creation. But I will follow you down this interpretation.
Why does a human have to judge something as good for it to be functionally useful?
Humans never came up with the move that AlphaZero used to win 1 of the 4 out of 5 games it won. Was that a bad move? Did AlphaZero devolve to Model Collapse because it made that move?
- patrickhogan1 2y agoAnd what’s interesting here is people will get annoyed with this. Am I pro-human? Absolutely Can non-human outputs be functionally valuable to humans and not per se harmful? Absolutely, we live in a biosphere that humans didn’t create or if humans did create it, it was humans more evolved than humans we are aware of.