3 ms·
Sure, if *you* did them they might have been fine. One really important thing the interview needs to screen for is the qualifications of the person actually try
by zeta0134 2y ago
Sure, if *you* did them they might have been fine. One really important thing the interview needs to screen for is the qualifications of the person actually trying to be hired, and not their buddy doing the work instead.
- Spivak 2y agoI am really glad I don't live in your world where interviewing is such a profoundly low-trust activity. I feel sorry for interviewers where that's a legitimate concern.
- hnfong 2y agoI mean, dude, take a look at what we were originally discussing -- an app on github that helps you cheat on live interviews in Zoom. FWIW, I've interviewed almost a hundred candidates in the past couple years and I think the number of candidates that I thought might be cheating are in the 3-5% range. It's fairly low, but if the take-home was the main thing that determined whether the candidate was hired, I wouldn't take that 3% chance.