> how gigantic $100 billion models are all you need for AGI and that it’s just a matter of time until we reach this scale. And if you didn’t see this you’re a s

> how gigantic $100 billion models are all you need for AGI and that it’s just a matter of time until we reach this scale. And if you didn’t see this you’re a simpleton who doesn’t understand how exponential curves work. OpenAI made no such claim. LLM stans on the internet definitely made such claim, that the Stargate project would be AGI and whatnot. But, like crypto bros, GPT hyperfans are just constantly deluded/lying so you shouldn't project their claims onto the corporations they simp for. That being said, Anthropic's CEO made a claim closer to what you're saying, that a 10-100 billion dollars model would be better than a human in almost every way. https://www.itpro.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/dollar100-billion-to-build-an-ai-model-anthropic-ceo-dario-amodei-predicts-soaring-ai-training-costs-but-models-will-become-far-more-powerful https://www.itpro.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/dol...