3 ms·
Well… a couple of things that could be done better in that example: —⁂— const [data, setData] = useState<Array<Array<object>> | undefined>(); That type sti
by chrismorgan 2y ago
Well… a couple of things that could be done better in that example:
—⁂—
const [data, setData] = useState<Array<Array<object>> | undefined>();
That type stinks. Kill the undefined bit by giving it an initial value, then you can skip the `?? []` later too; and replace Array<object> with the actual row type, probably naming it, maybe like this:
type Record = [string, number, number, number, number];
const [data, setData] = useState<Record[]>([]);
—⁂—
const params = Object.entries({ aroma, flavor, acidity, sweetness })
.map(([k, v]) => `${k}=${v}`)
.join("&");
No need to construct the query string manually:
const params = new URLSearchParams({ aroma, flavor, acidity, sweetness });
I confess I’m puzzled about this one too, as trailbase.js suggests you know about URLSearchParams, which is what you should use for all typical query string manipulation, parsing and generation.
- trailbase 2y agoDone. Thanks