4 ms·
Oh no, that sounds terrible. Internet should be open (for authoring, for participating). Paywalls destroy everything. People should invest in anti-gen-AI algo
by jindongz 2y ago
Oh no, that sounds terrible.
Internet should be open (for authoring, for participating). Paywalls destroy everything.
People should invest in anti-gen-AI algorithms. And make AI filters new infrastructures of Internet.
- eimrine 2y agoThe issue with the paywall is that this is hard to have enough good bank card to be able to pay without such an ugly thing as payment processors. Also any bank cards I have experienced can not pay anything less than 1$ without absurdly high comissions. If the paywall costs you literally less than 0.01$ with all kinds of comissions and having no authorization which means that the government can neither read your webpage purchases nor block them - would you still call it a paywall? I am sure that even sub 0.01$ payments will effectively filter 90% of the spammers.
- jindongz 2y agoThe problem is, if the price is too low, it won't stop spam as long as their creators can earn more than (or equal to) cost. If it is too high it will significantly prevent participation from humans, because most of the content sent by real humans on social media is not much different from spam...