3 ms·
1733443200 is even more unambigous. Or is it? The date format measures how many sun-ups so it is more accurate even if time-dilation. So date format is actually
by ikekkdcjkfke 2y ago
1733443200 is even more unambigous. Or is it? The date format measures how many sun-ups so it is more accurate even if time-dilation. So date format is actually just a sun position measure? Maybe we could just have a sun-ups since 1970 ticker.
Edit: and i guess why have leap seconds and stuff is because we are rrying to combine both sun position and elapsed seconds idk
- 05 2y agoAttoseconds since the Big Bang is the only datetime system worth a damn.
- lucb1e 2y agoThat number could be anything, such as a user ID. Even among timestamp libraries that work with January 1st 1970 UTC as the zero point, they might parse it as January 21st 1970 if they were expecting milliseconds rather than seconds. It doesn't get much more ambiguous than a plain number!