3 ms·
Reasons that I can't take this benchmark seriously: 1. Existing brute force algorithms solve 40% of this "reasoning" and "generalization" test. 2. AGI must ev
by a_wild_dandan 2y ago
Reasons that I can't take this benchmark seriously:
1. Existing brute force algorithms solve 40% of this "reasoning" and "generalization" test.
2. AGI must evidently fit on a single 16GB, decade-old GPU?
3. If ARC fails blind people, it's not a reasoning test. Reasoning is independent of visual acuity. So ARC is at best a vision processing then reasoning test. SotA model "failure" is meaningless. ("But what about the other format, JSON?" Yeah, I would love to see the human solve rate on that...)
- pshirshov 2y agoErgh. This test checks how good you can infer cellular automaton rules. Considering that CAs are Turing-complete, that might be a very good entry-level intelligence detector. If it's so easy to brute force, why wouldn't you claim the $1M?