3 ms·
> Disagree philosophically, there was no "them" to consent prior to them existing, so no one was forced. The point is that the obligation flows one way because
by WarOnPrivacy 2y ago
> Disagree philosophically, there was no "them" to consent prior to them existing, so no one was forced.
The point is that the obligation flows one way because one party was inserted into it without their consent.
Does their lack of preexistence impact that equation in a meaningful way?
- hiAndrewQuinn 2y ago>Does their lack of preexistence impact that equation in a meaningful way? Yes. Obviously.
- Ray20 2y ago> The point is that the obligation flows one way because one party was inserted into it without their consent. Well, philosophically it's not a big problem, because dissatisfied can very easily stop participating.