4 ms·
> calling people names won't change the fact that his life-long diet caused his cancer and killed him. Steve Jobs was not a life-long fruitarian. He dabbled in
by pell 2y ago
> calling people names won't change the fact that his life-long diet caused his cancer and killed him.
Steve Jobs was not a life-long fruitarian. He dabbled in all sorts of different diets. According to Walter Isaacson’s biography he seems to have generally lived as a pescatarian. Interestingly enough that diet is considered one of the healthier ones.
Obviously Steve Jobs should not have delayed his surgery. I understand that people are angry that a man with his means was still able to get a transplant and all the medical care that is unavailable for the rest of us. I understand. However to assume that his disease (and death) was the result of a diet choice when there is no credible evidence for it seems rather absurd.
- meiraleal 2y ago> I understand that people are angry that a man with his means was still able to get a transplant That's something I never heard. Are you angry because Steve Jobs got a transplant? > However to assume that his disease (and death) was the result of a diet choice when there is no credible evidence for it seems rather absurd. Have you tried reading the research in the post before commenting?
- pell 2y ago> Are you angry because Steve Jobs got a transplant? I am not angry however that was a sentiment often linked to the fact that he delayed his surgery. > Have you tried reading the research in the post before commenting? Unless I missed a comment there was absolutely no serious research shared that credibly connects let alone confirms that his death was connected to this diet choice.