3 ms·
Compare this to someone who controls the only available lifeboat while others are drowning. The person in control may not have pushed anyone overboard, but if t
by cdelsolar 2y ago
Compare this to someone who controls the only available lifeboat while others are drowning. The person in control may not have pushed anyone overboard, but if they refuse to help—especially after taking on the explicit role of “we’re here to help if something goes wrong”—they carry moral responsibility for the resulting harm. Insurance companies are not random bystanders; they are paid entities agreeing to intervene financially on behalf of the patient. Their explicit role makes their refusal to pay not merely passive, but an active withholding of assistance they were entrusted (and compensated) to provide. An insurance company knows full well that refusing to cover a critical treatment will likely result in the patient’s deterioration or death.
Remember Asimov's rules? A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. They are one and the same.
- nickff 2y agoWhat if the lifeboat skipper picks up many people, but decides that picking up more would endanger the lifeboat itself? Asimov’s rules don’t work; that’s the whole point.
- cogman10 2y agoIf you are to apply it the way health insurance works, the skipper is asking the drowning victims to give them all their money and then is deciding on who they rescue, mostly leaving the people far away to drown because that will have added fuel costs and they'd rather save that to go fishing on tuesday.
- nickff 2y agoThis analogy is already a stretch (I didn’t come up with it, was just responding to someone else), and you’re torturing it beyond reason.
- jiggawatts 2y agoBrian Thompson's net worth was $43M. He definitely has a yacht or two.