4 ms·
I agree, but I would state that it's easier to do encapsulation and modularity in OOP than procedural style. I prefer the functional method, though. In my opin
by debacle 14y ago
I agree, but I would state that it's easier to do encapsulation and modularity in OOP than procedural style.
I prefer the functional method, though. In my opinion it's much easier to understand and much more flexible, but many programmers dislike that flexibility.
- ufo 14y ago"Procedural style" is a strawman though, corroborated by years of people thinking C and FORTRAN are the only procedural languages out there. Most OOP languages are still procedural and many "traditional" procedural languages provide support for data abstraction.
- debacle 14y agoThe syntactical sugar provided by languages that support objects is the only real improvement over something like ADTs, but I think it's a noteworthy improvement.