3 ms·
Its not the government doing it. Its the constitutional court on the basis of some kind of evidence. That's how its supposed to work. It would be way more dange
by tokai 2y ago
Its not the government doing it. Its the constitutional court on the basis of some kind of evidence. That's how its supposed to work. It would be way more dangerous to let other states meddle in your elections. If the results was true the first time around it'll be the same next time. So in many ways there is no good reason to not have a redo if there is anykind of evidence of foul play.
- anon291 2y agoThe court is the government. > If the results was true the first time around it'll be the same next time. Not necessarily. Given that the opposition party now knows what the people seem to want, they can do all sorts of things, especially given the knowledge that the court will strike it down should the election not go in their favor.
- simion314 2y ago>Not necessarily. Given that the opposition party now knows what the people seem to want, they can do all sorts of things, especially given the knowledge that the court will strike it down should the election not go in their favor. Like what? they will make the opponents praise Putin and make China and Ruzzia send them funds to cancel the election again?
- anon291 2y agoA country is actually allowed to vote for a pro-Putin politician. You may not like it, but that's not what this is about. Also, it's actually okay to be against democracy. You should just say it instead of dancing around it though.
- ImHereToVote 2y agoPeople are simply lacking in empathy. Imagine you living so close to a proxy war. Imagine you have children. Which way would you vote?
- simion314 2y ago[flagged]
- simion314 2y ago[flagged]
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- sfjailbird 2y agoI think it's the "some kind of evidence" that's the important part.
- stefantalpalaru 2y ago[dead]
- idunnoman1222 2y agoThe right wing party literally made TikTok’s that the governing part(ies?) didn’t like, but which apparently resonated with the people they labelled them as misinformation. Have you heard that one before?
- IceHegel 2y agoUnder your theory, could the Supreme Court have canceled the 2016 election result because of Russian interference?
- dataflow 2y agoWhat does the US constitution say about the court's role in elections? What does the Romanian constitution say? (Though to be honest they could still make whatever ruling they want in the US. It's probably cause chaos as people try to figure out if they're bound by it.)