4 ms·
Thats interresting because it worked for me, and i only used operators i found in the kagi docs Oo (intitle / inurl - yes intext isnt in so i just added the ter
by voodooEntity 2y ago
Thats interresting because it worked for me, and i only used operators i found in the kagi docs Oo (intitle / inurl - yes intext isnt in so i just added the term instad of with intext)
I also tried others after the post, i just didnt update here - for example i did a site:laughingman.dev (my domain) to see what gets indexed, and saw also that google finds more stuff than kagi.
I don't wanne badmouth kagi - please dont missunderstand me. And yes search operators especially in the way i use them is a very specific thing, but well thats something i do daily and i rlly like it - if often helps me to find stuff alot more precise than with just some basic stuff. It also helps to sort out false postive results more reliable. If this is not a case for kagi well than kagi might just not be for me - which doesnt mean its not good for others. Im only speaking for myself
- Heeroo 2y agodont you search normally too? When you do this, you notice the main difference. I will create a bug report later, but i think the api isnt allowing this operators on google site? So they arent included