4 ms·
> The Death of Intel I know they are not doing well number wise but is it correct to claim this? Or it exaggerated? If it is somewhat true, what could Intel i
by ksynwa 2y ago
> The Death of Intel
I know they are not doing well number wise but is it correct to claim this? Or it exaggerated?
If it is somewhat true, what could Intel ideally do to not die? The article talks about Gelsinger's naivete and provides a quanitity for wafers but I don't know what that means.
- lotsofpulp 2y agoIt probably means the death of a high net income business or a business that leads in its field. They fall sufficiently far back that they can no longer afford to pay the wages and capital expenses necessary to compete.