4 ms·
It can't do any of that, though. There's no thought or reasoning behind anything LLMs generate, it's just a statistical pile of stuff. It's never going to gene
by habinero 2y ago
It can't do any of that, though.
There's no thought or reasoning behind anything LLMs generate, it's just a statistical pile of stuff. It's never going to generate anything new. It literally can't.
However, they are really good at highlighting just how many people will believe nonsense stated confidently.
- senko 2y ago> It's never going to generate anything new. It literally can't. It can't on it's own. But why does it need to? As a tool, the user can provide insight, imagination, soul, or guidance. And let's be honest, very little in our life, work, entertainment or science is completely new. We all stand on the shoulders of giants, remix existing work and reinterpreting existing work.
- harshitaneja 2y agoAt this point if you believe they don't produce anything new is either of two things- a) having not given a fair shot to the current flagship models or b) you have a very narrow definition of new that is satisfied only by a very minuscule of human population. If it's the latter, then agreed it doesn't produce anything new but so doesn't most of humanity and it doesn't need to, to be able to be of assistance.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- BlueTemplar 2y agoWhile so far I consider NNs to be mostly useless / harmful myself, don't you think that you might be overestimating what human beings themselves are doing ?