4 ms·
Won’t name my company, but we rely on Palantir Foundry for our data lake. And the only thing everybody wants [including Palantir itself] is to deploy at scale A
by lolive 2y ago
Won’t name my company, but we rely on Palantir Foundry for our data lake.
And the only thing everybody wants [including Palantir itself] is to deploy at scale AI capabilities tied properly to the rest of the toolset/datasets.
The issues at the moment are a mix of IP on the data, insurance on the security of private clouds infrastructures, deals between Amazon and Microsoft/OpenAI for the proper integration of ChatGPT on AWS, all these kind of things.
But discarding the enterprise needs is in my opinion a [very] wrong assumption.
- everybodyknows 2y agoIs the Foundry business the reason for the run up of PLTR this year? https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/PLTR https://www.cnbc.com/quotes/PLTR
- lolive 2y agoVery personal feeling, but without a datalake organized the way Foundry is organized, I don’t see how you can manage [cold] data at scale in a company [both in term of size, flexibility, semantics or R&D]. Given the fact that IT services in big companies WILL fail to build and maintain such a horribly complex stack, the walled garden nature of the Foundry stack is not so stupid. But all that is the technical part of things. Markets do not bless products. They bless revenues. And from that perspective, I have NO CLUE.