I assume the author typoed "recuse" (rather than intending "recurse") when itemising the feedback options! Interesting to see the process under the covers thes

I assume the author typoed "recuse" (rather than intending "recurse") when itemising the feedback options! Interesting to see the process under the covers these days. Faintly depressing, when one compares to what one reads about the Postel steered early days. Obligatory nod to my favourite bittersweet RFC-2468 (the number choice there has always struck me as a stroke of genius).