3 ms·
As already pointed out, they use ultrasound to beam the energy, and they claim to have filed some patents applications. Alas, there's a ton of prior art in this
by arturadib 14y ago
As already pointed out, they use ultrasound to beam the energy, and they claim to have filed some patents applications. Alas, there's a ton of prior art in this space, and I wonder how they're going to navigate them.
For example, ultrasound is already used to wirelessly charge pacemakers:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/11/wireless-pacemakers http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2011/11/wireless-pace...
And here is a very pertinent patent in this space (2004) that also contains a nice review of prior art:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=508SAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=ultrasound%20power%20transmission&pg=PA13#v=onepage&q&f=false http://www.google.com/patents?id=508SAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&...
The central difficulty in this idea, as pointed out in the above patent, is automatically aiming a sufficiently focused beam at the receiver. Otherwise you get killed by 1/rˆ2 power decay. And this is a non-trivial task, which will force them to either go the royalties way or dodge the existing patents.
I don't doubt the team can move forward, but I wonder if the undergrads (and their investors) have underestimated the difficulty and history of the problem.
That being said, it's refreshing to see folks inspired by real-world problems that don't involve "social".
Wishing them best of luck!