4 ms·
A poor use of the words for sure. “standard originator” would have been better.
by EternalFury 2y ago
A poor use of the words for sure. “standard originator” would have been better.
- michaelt 2y agoIt's an excellent use of words, especially given modern standardisation practices - if Google adds something new into Chrome and publishes an RFC at the same time, are they not marching at the front of the implementers, the standard inviting others to follow in their footsteps?
- grues-dinner 2y ago> standard inviting others to follow in their footsteps? And an message to anyone in the way to vacate or feel the point of a gladius and the hobnails of a caliga.
- bee_rider 2y agoI dunno, I kinda like it. The standard bearer in an army is sorta seen as a brave position… but really, it is also one of prestige, possibly political advantage, and the other units in your cohort might actually prioritize defending you.
- thaumasiotes 2y ago> and the other units in your cohort might actually prioritize defending you. They'd better, if they want to win a battle.
- grues-dinner 2y agoEven losing the battle wouldn't necessarily be the end of it. Going home without your standard was really not a good look for the unit.