3 ms·
is your search operators stuff a little bit too specfiic? Kagi uses google, brave and others. i think the operators just dont work correctly and some you use, j
by Heeroo 2y ago
is your search operators stuff a little bit too specfiic? Kagi uses google, brave and others. i think the operators just dont work correctly and some you use, just dont exist. and your search this way is highly specfic. when you search regulary you will notice the difference. look at the listable filter when search normally. Your example just doesnt work.
btw this gives more, though some incorrecT: 2024 backup intitle:Index intitle:of
https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/search-operators.html https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/search-operators.html
- voodooEntity 2y agoThats interresting because it worked for me, and i only used operators i found in the kagi docs Oo (intitle / inurl - yes intext isnt in so i just added the term instad of with intext) I also tried others after the post, i just didnt update here - for example i did a site:laughingman.dev (my domain) to see what gets indexed, and saw also that google finds more stuff than kagi. I don't wanne badmouth kagi - please dont missunderstand me. And yes search operators especially in the way i use them is a very specific thing, but well thats something i do daily and i rlly like it - if often helps me to find stuff alot more precise than with just some basic stuff. It also helps to sort out false postive results more reliable. If this is not a case for kagi well than kagi might just not be for me - which doesnt mean its not good for others. Im only speaking for myself
- Heeroo 2y agodont you search normally too? When you do this, you notice the main difference. I will create a bug report later, but i think the api isnt allowing this operators on google site? So they arent included