4 ms·
> "They could very well trick a developer" Large Language Models aren't alive and thinking. This is an artificial fear campaign to raise money from VCs and sov
by echelon 2y ago
> "They could very well trick a developer"
Large Language Models aren't alive and thinking. This is an artificial fear campaign to raise money from VCs and sovereign wealth funds.
If OpenAI was so afraid of AI misuse, they wouldn't be firing their safety team and partnering with the DoD.
It's all a ruse.
- bossyTeacher 2y ago> If OpenAI was so afraid of AI misuse, they wouldn't be firing their safety team and partnering with the DoD. What makes you think that? I sounds reasonable that a dangerous tool/substance/technology might be profitable and thus the profits justify the danger. See all the companies polluting the planet and risking the future of humanity RIGHT NOW. All the weapon companies developing their weapons to make them more lethal.
- rvnx 2y agohttps://www.technologyreview.com/2024/12/04/1107897/openais-new-defense-contract-completes-its-military-pivot/amp/ https://www.technologyreview.com/2024/12/04/1107897/openais-... OpenAI is partnering with the DoD
- 8note 2y agorewording: if openai thought it was dangerous, they would avoid having the DoD use it
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ralusek 2y agoMany non-sequiturs > Large Language Models aren't alive and thinking not required to deploy deception > If OpenAI was so afraid of AI misuse, they wouldn't be firing their safety team They could just be recognizing that if not everybody is prioritizing safety, they might as well try to get AGI first
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- eichi 2y agoWe might want to kick out guys who only talk about safety or ethics and barely contribute the project.