4 ms·
What on earth is this work that they're doing that's so resilient to the fallible nature of LLMs? Is it just document search with a RAG?
by PittleyDunkin 2y ago
What on earth is this work that they're doing that's so resilient to the fallible nature of LLMs? Is it just document search with a RAG?
- tiahura 2y agoEverything. Drafting correspondence, pleadings discovery, discovery responses. Reviewing all of the same. Reviewing depositions, drafting deposition outlines. Everything that is “word processing,” and that’s a lot.
- PittleyDunkin 2y agoWell that's terrifying. Good luck to them.
- wing-_-nuts 2y agoTo be honest, much of contract law is formal boilerplate. I can understand why they'd want to move their role to 'review' instead of 'generate'
- drdaeman 2y agoSo, instead of fixing the issue (legal documents becoming a barely manageable mess) they’re investing money into making it… even worse? This world is so messed up.
- randallsquared 2y agoThey have no lever with which to fix the issue.
- Terr_ 2y agoArguably the same problem is occurs in programming: Anything so formulaic and common that an LLM can regurgitate it with a decent level of reliability... is something that ought to have been folded into method/library already. Or it already exists in some howto documentation, but nobody wanted to skim the documentation.
- PittleyDunkin 2y agoWhy not just move over to forms with structured input?