4 ms·
That'd be unironically simpler than the current state of things.
by eddd-ddde 2y ago
That'd be unironically simpler than the current state of things.
- pier25 2y agoNah. There's so much stuff that would need to be implemented. Just think of all the functionality related to text that browsers give you in HTML: styles, spellchecking, selection, accessibility features, etc. And that's just text.
- mr_toad 2y agoMost people would just use the most popular framework that did all that for them, while the remainder would complain loudly about the shortcomings of that framework, and we’d be right back where we started.
- gf000 2y agoIt would be significantly worse, unless there is a very good reason for that (e.g. some app like Photoshop could work that way). You lose any form of accessibility, inspectability, AdBlocking won't work, in many cases even mouse select/copy-paste won't work..