> The problem was nobody was connecting the cost cutting to outcomes. If so, that sounds like (reckless) criminal negligence in the most charitable case and wi

> The problem was nobody was connecting the cost cutting to outcomes. If so, that sounds like (reckless) criminal negligence in the most charitable case and wilful disregard bordering malice in the worst case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence