3 ms·
Yeah they have, but being broke poor in those developing nations sucks much more than in the US. Their development is mostly reflected in the lifestyle of middl
by Cumpiler69 2y ago
Yeah they have, but being broke poor in those developing nations sucks much more than in the US. Their development is mostly reflected in the lifestyle of middle and upper class not of the poor. You have no idea how good the poor in the US have it compared to large parts of the world.
- Jensson 2y agoYou said luxury life, that is different than saying the poor in USA are better off than the poor in for example China. American poor don't live as well as luxury life in China.
- Pigalowda 2y agoWhy use China? I’d rather be poor in the US than rich in DRC, Sudan, Yemen, Libya, eritrea, Somalia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Syria, Haiti, etc etc Using the second largest economy which has many mega cities you can tour on Google earth and plenty of millionaires and billionaires isn’t really the right comparison. Like using Japan or Germany.
- Jensson 2y agoYou said 80% of the planet, China + first world nations is much more than 20% of the planets population. If you said 50% it would have been different.
- Pigalowda 2y agoDid he say 80%? That’s definitely pretty high. China by itself is already about 20% of the world population.
- Jensson 2y agoThe part I quoted was: "That's a luxury life for 80% of the planet." So yeah he said that.
- Pigalowda 2y agoWell, 71% of the world’s surface is ocean and about 10% is desert. So that’s over 81% of the planet. I think we can now both agree that you are completely wrong and I am completely right.